Recording of Court Proceedings

Not only must Justice be done; it must also be seen to be done

.. is oft repeated. And indeed Justice is supposed to be done in public.  Unless decided by the Court to be an ” in camera ” trial, one can simply visit the Court and watch the proceedings. Even Court Records – submissions by different parties and then the final judgement – is supposed to be Public and accessible to anyone.

In Theory.

Come the Digital Era then, the logical next step would have been recording of Court proceedings. And indeed the more advanced countries seem to have moved in such direction as you can find plenty such videos on youTube ….

In India, however, the Jury of honorable Judges is still  out on the matter. Why they want to avoid public scrutiny is of course best known to them.

It is interesting , hence, to note of some attempts being made in this direction. For one such, see :

And for the full story on this, see :

http://www.legallyindia.com/201402284392/Bar-Bench-Litigation/deepak-khosla-records-fight-with-clb-judge-about-audio-recording-before-clb

And  on more on the man, see :

http://www.legallyindia.com/201308073894/Interviews/deepak-khosla-profile

Taken from there, a truly utopian vision- as any who has ever been to any court would vouch ! :

“If it were utopia, the moment I go to court the judge would stand up and say to me: ‘Mr. Khosla despite our best efforts at devising laws whose objective would be to prevent people breaking the law, it seems in your case we have failed. So on behalf of society I owe you an apology and I apologise. Now please tell me what your problem is and how can I help you?’ That’s how a hearing should start,” 53-year-old law student Deepak Khosla tells me.

Indeed, the previous Government had made some plans in his direction See;
http://archive.indianexpress.com/news/legal-reforms-government-for-video-recording-of-court-proceedings/1193581/

Quoting :

“The Advisory Council met here. Unanimously the council believed that court proceedings must be videographed and that the technology (for the same) must be put in place now,” he told PTI here.

Explaining the reason behind the move, Sibal said the processes of the law must be “as transparent” like the processes of the government.

Sibal said the plan is to begin with video recording of the proceedings of the trial court.

“…start with the trial courts as it is the foundation of the justice system,” he said.

The Minister said the judiciary will be taken on board on the issue.

UNQUOTE

And with the present Modi Government’s push for transparency in all fields, one can only hope for the best !

2 thoughts on “Recording of Court Proceedings

  1. Just wanted to post it here .. Harish Salve arguing in International Court of Justice – Marshall Islands case…so, internationally, our judiical system is quite happy being videographed !

    Case 1: 20150310 Marshall Islands v. India (Jurisdiction)
    The International Court of Justice (ICJ), principal judicial organ of the UN, holds hearings from 7-16 March 2016 in three distinct cases filedby the Republic of the Marshall Islands against India, Pakistan and the United Kingdom, with regard to Obligations concerning Negotiations relating to Cessation of the Nuclear Arms Race and to Nuclear Disarmament (preliminary phase)

    http://webtv.un.org/search/case-1-20150310-marshall-islands-v.-india-jurisdiction/4794914981001?term=marshall%20islands&languages=&sort=date#full-text

Leave a Reply

DISCLAIMER FOR ALL USERS OF THIS WEBSITE

General information and advice provided is without any warranties as to suitability for any use, correctness and application to any specific case. Please always take proper legal counsel .

Your use of this Site in any fashion means your agreement and acknowledgement of the following :

1) We have not induced you by any means such as advertisements to use this Site neither have solicited any work from you.

2) All information here is for generic use and you use it completely at your own volition and risk. In no way does this usage constitute a client- lawyer relationship and we are NOT liable in any way for any action taken by anyone relying upon the information presented here. It is reiterated that proper Legal Counsel must always be taken. None of the information contained in our website amounts to any form of legal opinion or legal advice.

3) All efforts made by us via this Site are purely voluntary and gratis. It is not required by us to answer any question and we may refuse to do so at any time without informing the Questioner.

4) Our website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using our site, you agree to our use of cookies.

इस वेबसाइट के सभी उपयोगकर्ताओं के लिए अस्वीकरण

इस वेबसाइट द्वारा प्रदान की गई जानकारी और सलाह सामान्य है। वह किसी भी विशिष्ट मामले में किसी भी उपयोग के लिए नहीं है। कृपया हमेशा उचित कानूनी सलाह लें।

आपके द्वारा इस साइट का किसी भी तरह का उपयोग का अर्थ निम्नलिखित के प्रति आपकी सहमति और स्वीकृति है:

1) हमने आपको विज्ञापनों जैसे किसी भी माध्यम से इस साइट का उपयोग करने के लिए प्रेरित नहीं किया है और न ही आपसे कोई काम मांगा है।

2) यहां दी गयी सभी जानकारी सामान्य उपयोग के लिए है और आप इसका उपयोग पूरी तरह से अपनी इच्छा और जोखिम पर करते हैं। यह उपयोग किसी भी तरह से ग्राहक-वकील संबंध का गठन नहीं करता है । यहां प्रस्तुत जानकारी पर भरोसा करते हुए किसी भी व्यक्ति द्वारा की गई किसी भी कार्रवाई के लिए हम किसी भी तरह से उत्तरदायी नहीं हैं। यह दोहराया जाता है कि हमेशा उचित कानूनी सलाह ली जानी चाहिए। हमारी वेबसाइट में मौजूद कोई भी जानकारी किसी भी प्रकार की कानूनी राय या कानूनी सलाह के बराबर नहीं है।

3) इस साइट के माध्यम से हमारे द्वारा किए गए सभी प्रयास पूरी तरह से स्वैच्छिक और निःशुल्क हैं। हमारे लिए किसी भी प्रश्न का उत्तर देना आवश्यक नहीं है और हम प्रश्नकर्ता को सूचित किए बिना किसी भी समय ऐसा करने से इनकार कर सकते हैं।

4) हमारी वेबसाइट आपके उपयोगकर्ता अनुभव को बेहतर बनाने के लिए कुकीज़ का उपयोग करती है। हमारी साइट का उपयोग करने का मतलब है की आप कुकीज़ के हमारे उपयोग से सहमत हैं।